Market coverage
Public aggregators apply their own eligibility, classification, and data-quality methods. The dated RWA.xyz snapshot is not a complete census of every token, platform, or legal structure.
Research boundary
Useful evidence is still incomplete evidence
These limitations are part of the product, not a footnote to it.
Time
Point-in-time values can change after publication. Historical screenshots do not become live data merely because a page still displays them.
Identity
Addresses, accounts, transfers, and modeled users do not map cleanly to unique people, beneficial owners, or eligible investors.
Legal effect
Public terms can be incomplete or superseded. Only complete controlling documents, facts, and jurisdiction-specific professional analysis can address enforceability or classification.
Liquidity
Listings, transfers, volumes, and platform buybacks are different mechanisms. None alone proves an exit at a desired price or size.
Valuation and cash flow
Appraisals, issuer targets, rent rolls, collections, and token prices measure different things and can become stale or conflicted.
Forecasts
Deloitte's 2035 figures are projections based on market forecasts and penetration assumptions, not current observed market value.
Commercial estimates
Henley wealth figures use an in-house model and open-source holdings; they are not an official census.
Scoring
RWA Lens is a deterministic triage framework. Its labels are not probabilities of default, regulatory approval, investment grades, or recommendations.
Correction or missing context?